Diagnostic, audit, implementation, or governance?

A diagnostic is an automated baseline of controllable public signals. A paid audit adds documented buyer-prompt tests, named competitor and source evidence, human validation, and a prioritized 90-day plan. Implementation turns those priorities into working processes. Governance formalizes controls, responsibilities, and audit readiness.

01 Free Breach

Use it for a fast baseline of public visibility, proof, offer readability, and the first gaps to fix.

02 BREACH Pro audit

Use it when you need documented buyer prompts, competitor and source evidence, human validation, and a 90-day plan.

03 AI Implementation

Use the implementation partnership when priorities are clear but your team needs help turning one process at a time into a working AI-enabled workflow.

04 Governance and ISO readiness

Use governance support when you need controls, policies, evidence, Loi 25 alignment, or ISO/IEC 42001 readiness. Prism is coming soon.

What the diagnostic looks for

This AI diagnostic is not a full AI audit. It works as an AI exposure report: it organizes what is visible, what is missing, and what should be validated before investing in a heavier mandate.

Visibility

Whether public pages make the business easy to find, classify, and describe.

Public proof

Whether claims are supported by pages, examples, trust markers, and concrete buyer evidence.

Shadow AI and data

Whether AI use, sensitive data, vendors, and governance obligations need a separate internal review.

30/90-day priorities

Which fixes belong in the first month, which require Breach Pro, and which should connect to Law 25 or ISO 42001?

Start with evidence, then choose the support you need

Use BREACH for the public-signal baseline. Use BREACH Pro for a human-validated audit and 90-day plan. Choose AI Implementation when you want help executing the priorities, or governance support when controls, policies, evidence, Loi 25, or ISO/IEC 42001 readiness are the real need.